Measuring practice leadership in supported accommodation services for people with intellectual disability: Comparing staff-rated and observational measures.

MEDICAL care; BUDDHISM; COGNITION; INTERVIEWING; LEADERSHIP; LONGITUDINAL method; PEOPLE with intellectual disabilities; RESEARCH evaluation; SOCIAL support; EDUCATIONAL attainment

Background Studies incorporating staff-rated or observational measures of practice leadership have shown that where practice leadership is stronger, active support is better implemented. The study aim was to compare measures of practice leadership used in previous research to determine the extent of their correspondence.Method A subset of data from a longitudinal study regarding 29 front-line managers working across 36 supported accommodation services in Australia was used. An observed measure of practice leadership, based on an interview and observation of a front-line manager, was compared with ratings of practice leadership completed by staff. The quality of active support was rated after a 2-hour structured observation.Results Correlations between staff-rated and observed measures were nonsignificant. Only the observed measure was correlated with the quality of active support.Conclusions This study provides evidence to support using an observational measure of practice leadership rather than reliance on staff ratings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)